Re: toward tests for spec#issue-mt-ns (XSLT literal result element case)

On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:56 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
[...]
> i.e. they answer "yes" to today's poll.

Harry asked for somebody to elaborate on the XSLT literal
result element case, which I gave as a reason to answer "no".

So... see
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/litres.xml
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/litres

Here's a copy to pore over...

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	 xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
	 xsl:version="1.0"
	 xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
	 >
 <rdf:Description rdf:about="">
   <rdfs:seeAlso

rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#result-element-stylesheet" />
   <rdfs:seeAlso

rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#xmlFunctions-34" />
   <rdfs:seeAlso

rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#nsMediaType-3" />
   <dc:description>The start tag of the root element
   of this document seems to say that it's an RDF/XML document.
   But it also says that it's an XSLT literal result element.
   And the element after this one doesn't parse as RDF/XML.
   But after you run it thru an XSLT processor, the result
   *is* RDF/XML. So when it's served up as application/xml,
   what GRDDL results does it have, if any?
   </dc:description>
   <dc:description>
     <xsl:value-of select="2+2" />
   </dc:description>
 </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E