W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > November 2006

Re: toward tests for spec#issue-mt-ns (XSLT literal result element case)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:29:30 -0600
To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1162405771.8627.237.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:56 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> i.e. they answer "yes" to today's poll.

Harry asked for somebody to elaborate on the XSLT literal
result element case, which I gave as a reason to answer "no".

So... see

Here's a copy to pore over...

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 <rdf:Description rdf:about="">

rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#result-element-stylesheet" />

rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#xmlFunctions-34" />

rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#nsMediaType-3" />
   <dc:description>The start tag of the root element
   of this document seems to say that it's an RDF/XML document.
   But it also says that it's an XSLT literal result element.
   And the element after this one doesn't parse as RDF/XML.
   But after you run it thru an XSLT processor, the result
   *is* RDF/XML. So when it's served up as application/xml,
   what GRDDL results does it have, if any?
     <xsl:value-of select="2+2" />

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 18:29:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:09 UTC