License -- Re: Atom to N3 XSLT for #issue-output-formats

I think the best is if Danny just puts a W3C license on the code he  
contributed to sommer. I think this is just too unimportant for our  
lawyers to get interested in. I have not received a reply on this  
subject.


Henry




On 29 Nov 2006, at 04:47, Danny Ayers wrote:

> On 29/11/06, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
>
> Nice work Dan.
>
>> Danny, Henry, I infer that you're granting W3C license
>> to copy these materials into our test suite. I think the WG
>> participation agreement might imply that you grant joint,
>> non-exclusive copyright to W3C. I'd have to double-check to be sure;
>> do you care?
>
> I can't speak for Henry, but you can make that inference on this XSLT
> and any other material I submit (unless explicitly stated otherwise).
>
> btw, I'm hoping to get the XSLT completed in the next week (with a
> minimal test harness), along with a corresponding XSLT 1.0
> Atom2AtomOwl RDF/XML.
>
> Cheers,
> Danny.
>
> -- 
>
> http://dannyayers.com