On Dec 14, 2006, at 12:29 AM, Ben Adida wrote: > Dan Connolly wrote: >> The RDFa spec seems to turn the relationship into an RDF property >> named >> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtmltransformation > > Ah yes, the darn no # or / issue. > > Yes, clearly this should be fixed to something that makes *some* sense, > like http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml#transformation. Yes, that would be better, I suppose, though the HTML 4 spec is reasonably clear that when a link relationship is dominated by a profile, the profile is what grounds the link relationship in URI space, and the link relationship isn't defined by HTML. > This is on our issue list, btw: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2005-current- > issues#xhtml1-namespace Ah. good. > Btw, is rel=transformation a reserved value? Or is it defined by the > specific GRDDL profile in <HEAD>? The latter; it's defined by the GRDDL profile. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Thursday, 14 December 2006 05:42:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT