- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:27:28 -0500
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 03:12 +0100, Harry Halpin wrote: [...] > Not sure: Do people think GRDDL "MUST support ECMAscript[1]"?" Not until we have implementation experience. And I don't mean experience with similar situations. As Brian points out (25 Aug 2006 00:10:39 -0500) the devil is in the details. Until somebody is sufficiently motivated by some real-world use case to work out those details, no, we shouldn't require (MUST) or even recommend (SHOULD) Javascript. to reiterate: my position on issue-whichlangs is GRDDL clients SHOULD support XSLT 1.0 GRDDL clients MAY support other programming languages. I don't mind mentioning Javascript, XQuery, XProc etc. as examples of other languages. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 25 August 2006 19:27:43 UTC