Liasoning with XML Processing Group?

I was recently talking to Murray Maloney when discussing GRDDL
informally that for some of our more complex use cases (using multiple
arguments with GRDDL, BenA's case of multiple chained transformations)
that we might want to liason with the XML Processing Model Group Working
Group, as they are encountering many of the same issues when
transforming XML->XML. What do people think?

More importantly, how wedded are we to use-cases that require these sort
of things? GRDDL as it stands now is a single transformation (usually
XSLT) applied to a single HTML file that returns RDF. However, a number
of use cases have been brought up, albeit informally, that wish to
expand upon this. How serious are we? My opinion is that if there is
clearly demonstrated need for such use case and they can be implemented
in a consistent and elegant manner, I am fine with them.  Yet complexity
for the sake of complexity without concrete use cases is a bad thing :)


-- 
		-harry

Harry Halpin,  University of Edinburgh 
http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426

Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2006 03:45:39 UTC