- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:23:32 +0200
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>, "public-grddl-comments@w3.org" <public-grddl-comments@w3.org>
Harry Halpin wrote: > ... > 2) For users who use @rel="profile", get the GRDDL transformation and > then run it over the HTML5 DOM of the page. Minor change. > > What we need to know from *both* the HTML5 community is simple: is > @rel="profile" in the spec, and does the community have consensus? > ... That touches another issue: who owns the namespace of rel values? (for which there is not HTNL5 WG consensus either, as far as I can tell). Unrelated to that: in case we could agree that head/@profile could be substituted by link/@rel=profile with the same meaning, why on earth would we then remove head/@profile in the first place? Why break it, when its functionality is actually used? BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 25 August 2008 11:24:13 UTC