W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-comments@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: GRDDL and OWL/XML

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 16:09:35 +0100
Message-ID: <4829AF2F.3090903@hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org, Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>, public-grddl-wg@w3.org

Dan Connolly wrote:

>> People are reading the SHOULD as a MUST.
> 
> Really? I am not. I just haven't seen a good reason to make
> an exception in this case.
> 

+1

(the definition of SHOULD is very good in my view, see RFC 2119, which I 
am sure Bijan knows ...)

Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 15:11:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 13 May 2008 15:11:28 GMT