Dan Connolly wrote: >> People are reading the SHOULD as a MUST. > > Really? I am not. I just haven't seen a good reason to make > an exception in this case. > +1 (the definition of SHOULD is very good in my view, see RFC 2119, which I am sure Bijan knows ...) JeremyReceived on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 15:11:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 13 May 2008 15:11:28 GMT