W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-comments@w3.org > July to September 2007

RE: Comments on GRDDL (using 3rd-party XML schemas with GRDDL) [OK?]

From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:53:36 +0100
To: 'Norman Gray' <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>, "'C. M. Sperberg-McQueen'" <cmsmcq@acm.org>
Cc: ogbujic@ccf.org, 'Jonathan Robie' <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>, 'Andrew Eisenberg' <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org, w3c-xsl-query@w3.org
Message-id: <005901c7da73$8a29d500$313410ac@turtle>

> > (But my experience suggests that "may not"
> > can be ambiguous for some users 

It's ambiguous, full stop. It's only unambiguous to those readers who may
not see the alternative meaning. Editors may not use it.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2007 10:53:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:43 GMT