Re: Comments on GRDDL (using 3rd-party XML schemas with GRDDL) [OK?]

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen wrote:
>
>
> On 26 Jul 2007, at 07:27 , Harry Halpin wrote:
>
>>
>> Would adding the sentence in [brackets] satisfy both you, Michael, and
>> the Working Group:
>>
>> "The GRDDL specification states that any transformation identified by an
>> author of a GRDDL source document will provide a Faithful Rendition
>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/#sec_rend> of the information expressed in
>> the source document. The specification also grants a GRDDL-aware agent
>> the license <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-grddl-20070302/#sec_agt> to
>> makes a determination of whether or not to apply a particular
>> transformation guided by user interaction, a local security policy, or
>> the agent's capabilities. [For example, a GRDDL-aware agent may have a
>> security policy that prevents it from accessing GRDDL transformations
>> located in untrusted domain names, it may be unable to apply
>> transformations given in a language it does not support, and it may
>> feature additional non-normative capabilities such as allowing
>> transformations to be found in schemas not specified at the namespace
>> document.] However, in defining these tests it was assumed that the
>> GRDDL-aware agent being tested is using a security policy which does
>> *not* prevent it from applying transformations identified in each test
>> [, supports XSLT 1.0, and does not rely on any capabilities outside
>> those defined in the GRDDL Specification]. Such an agent should produce
>> the GRDDL result associated with each normative test, except as
>> specified immediately below."
>
> It does satisfy me. I will ask at the joint meeting of XSL
> and XML Query next Tuesday that the groups confirm that
> it satisfies them.

It satisfies me as well.

Jonathan