W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-comments@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: (formal) comment on security considerations

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:14:48 +0000
Message-ID: <45D2EF28.9090704@hpl.hp.com>
To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
CC: public-grddl-comments@w3.org, jena-devel <jena-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>



Harry Halpin wrote:
> Jeremy,
>    
>     The final decision in DanC's hands, but we already decided as a WG
> not to use conformance labels. However, we do want implementers to be
> aware of security issues. So, if that text was added to section 7 as
> informative text and we substituted the words "GRDDL-aware agent" for
> "GRDDL-aware processor", would you feel like your comment has been
> addressed?
>

Of course.

In terms of "GRDDL-aware processor" I simply made a mistake.

I would be more comfortable with normative text but ...

Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 11:15:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:55:02 UTC