W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-comments@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: (formal) comment on security considerations

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:18:12 -0600
To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org, jena-devel <jena-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-Id: <1171401493.7497.1115.camel@dirk>

On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 15:55 -0500, Harry Halpin wrote:
> Jeremy,
>    
>     The final decision in DanC's hands, but we already decided as a WG
> not to use conformance labels.

Er... my suggestion is to put it back in the WG's hands, but I suppose
it's good to know if Jeremy is OK with not adding a conformance
label...

>  However, we do want implementers to be
> aware of security issues. So, if that text was added to section 7 as
> informative text and we substituted the words "GRDDL-aware agent" for
> "GRDDL-aware processor", would you feel like your comment has been
> addressed?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 21:18:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:55:02 UTC