ok, I'm fine with your response

Thanks

Dan Connolly escribió:
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 11:10 +0200, José Manuel Cantera Fonseca wrote:
  
Dear GRDDL WG members,

Reading the GRDDL spec it is not clear to me what will be the
alternative mechanism to be used when a XSLT sheet is not used for
extracting RDF from a document. It seems to me that the only option is
to create a "dummy" XSLT that invokes a URL that actually retrieves or
generates the RDF. 


I think that it could be very useful to have a new attribute with
"retrieval" semantics and not wih "transformation" semantics. As a
result, GRDDL will be the standard mechanism in the web used for
locating the RDF associated to a web page. 

Proposed syntax:

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
      xmlns:grddl='http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#'
      grddl:retrieval="http://www.example.org/jsp/myrdf.jsp"
 >
or using the profile-based syntax 
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
  <head profile="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view">
    <title>Some Document</title>

    <link rel="retrieval"
       href="http://www.example.org/jsp/myrdf.jsp" />
    



If I understand you correctly, dereferencing
http://www.example.org/jsp/myrdf.jsp yields RDF that
is an alternative version of the HTML document, yes?

The HTML 4 spec already standardizes a syntax for that:

  <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.example.org/jsp/myrdf.jsp" />

See section 6.12 Link types
  http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#type-links

Please let us know if this is a satisfactory response to your comment.

  
I look forward to your comments on this

Best wishes