Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Hi Dave > > you're right something did change. > I added xml:base and xml:lang support to embeddedRDF > http://www.w3.org/2003/g/embeddedRDF > For the xml:base support I was using an XSLT 2.0 function, with forward > compatible processing code for XSLT 1.0. > Since you reported difficulty with this, the WG consensus, at our > meeting today, was to not use the XSLT 2.0 function, but have the XSLT > 1.0 processing only. > > As a side effect > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/embedded-rdf7 > > cannot be processed by this transform, and the WG decided not to approve > either of the related tests. > > In summary, we have taken your comment as a comment against the library > rather than the test cases, and, we hope addressed it. > > Please confirm that this is satisfactory. Yes is is. Thanks DaveReceived on Friday, 27 April 2007 03:04:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:43 GMT