W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-comments@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: Javascript and GRDDL [#issue-whichlangs]

From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 15:22:21 -0400 (EDT)
To: Stefano Mazzocchi <stefanom@mit.edu>
cc: public-grddl-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0704011502440.26002@joplin.bio.ri.ccf.org>

On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> 2) turn *SHOULD* into *MUST* support XSLT1 (and say that it *MUST*
> return RDF/XML or it *MUST* have a mechanism to indicate what type of
> output the GRDDL-aware agent should expect, otherwise there is another
> guessing step that needs to take place).

Hello Stefano.  Just wanted to let you know that though most of the dialog 
on your commentary had been with respect to Javascript and the closed [1] 
#which-langs issue, the Working Group is also taking into consideration 
your comments about a mechanism to indicate what type of output the agent
should expect (beyond RDF/XML).  This is with respect to 
the #issue-output-formats [2] issue.  This issue was closed via a specific
test [3] which demonstrates the use of XSLT's xsl:output/@media-type 
directive to this end

The Working Group is considering what modifications to the specification 
(if any) can further highlight/clarify this additional mechanism.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/#which-langs
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/#issue-output-formats
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl-tests/#atomttl1

Chimezie Ogbuji
Lead Systems Analyst
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Office: (216)444-8593
ogbujic@ccf.org
Received on Sunday, 1 April 2007 19:22:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:43 GMT