Re: specifying GRDDL transformation for document with no transformation attribute? from Dan Connolly on 2006-10-26 (public-grddl-comments@w3.org from October to December 2006)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:55:02 -0500
To: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
Cc: public-grddl-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1161867303.4182.415.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 10:20 +0200, Fabien Gandon wrote:
> I like the idea of being able to specify in a document a GRDDL for 
> another document / set of document without changing them or their schema.

I'm not sure I agree, but this comments list isn't the place
for WG members to argue with one another.

Fabien, anything you say to the comments list is likely to
be taken as the position of the WG. Please take care.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Thursday, 26 October 2006 12:55:23 UTC