- From: Dzmitry Malyshau <dmalyshau@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:28:16 -0400
- To: public-gpu@w3.org
This is great, thanks Kevin! I think it deserves a new "feature-request" label for the project:) It would be best to continue discussion there. Any relevant bits from the mailing lists could be quoted or linked there. Thanks, Dzmitry On 8/8/19 10:04 AM, Kevin Rogovin wrote: > Hi, > > I've filed an issue for each feature request I listed: > - https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/390 (HW clip planes) > - https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/391 (dual source blending) > - https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/392 (derived pipeline state) > - https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/393 (renderpasses) > - https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/394 (advanced blend equations) > - https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/395 (fragment shader > interlock) > - https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/396 (fragment shader > framebuffer fetch) > > I've also filed two more: > - https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/397 (triangle strips and > primitive restart) > - https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/398 (early depth/stencil > tests). > > Would it be productive to discuss them here further or only in the > issues? Would it also be useful to give links the discussion in the > mailing list to the issues? > > Best Regards, > -Kevin Rogovin
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2019 14:28:43 UTC