- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:58:19 +0000
- To: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
We've had one more implementation report on ORG. I'm not aware of any others that are expected at this stage (unless Ghislain, are you working on one?). The current status is at [1]. This looks pretty good though does leave us with 5 terms that only have one actual implementation - though each has at least one other "relevant to future work" votes from outside the WG. I have drafted the PR transition request on the Wiki [2] with some discussion of this status. I've updated the Editor's Draft to include the namespace and link to the vocabulary in the Abstract and to change to Joćo Paulo's diagram. Static draft PR version and diff is linked from the PR transition page. Questions (especially for W3C folk): (1) Is the argument in the draft transition request page about going ahead with the 5 "low usage terms" still present likely to fly? (2) I don't understand the section of the PR transition template about cutting and pasting the STOD section. Is that from the CR or PR document and what's the point of cut/pasting that? (3) We use Turtle for the examples and thus reference Turtle, which is at CR. I've made that reference non-normative. Is this sufficient to avoid being entangled with waiting for Turtle to transition as well? Dave [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_Implementations [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_PR_transition
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 14:58:52 UTC