Re: Best Practices editors: to-do list & timelines - For tomorrow's meeting

> On 21 Nov 2013, at 09:04, Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dave, all
>> 
>> I see the Procurement section is still in there.
>> 
>> To repeat my previous emails and telecon comments on this subject, -1 to
>> inclusion of that in the Best Practice document.
> Have we (as a Group) reach a "consensus" on this ?

If a WG member threatens a formal objection, then obviously consensus was not reached.

> Do we need to raise an issue here and vote today, or this was already done? Any pointer? Chairs?

It's pretty clear that a vote would only reveal that Dave sustains his objection.

There seem to be three ways of moving forward:

1. Those who really want to keep the procurement section need to convince Dave of its value or work on its contents to make the section acceptable to him.
2. You could try to wear him down and sneak the document past him when he doesn't pay attention.
3. The editors could drop the section and publish it somewhere else (wiki, blog, etc.)

My preference would be for 3.

Best,
Richard


> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Ghislain
> 
> -- 
> Ghislain Atemezing
> EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
> Campus SophiaTech
> 450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
> e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178
> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
> 

Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 09:35:07 UTC