- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 23:21:11 +0000
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- CC: W3C public GLD WG WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
On 20/11/13 20:40, Phil Archer wrote: > Ooh, good catch, yes, thanks Tim. > > We normally do this (see http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-regorg/ for example) > > We'll do this on the next step. > > @Dave, @Fadi please note (it normally goes just about the copyright line). Interesting, not seen that before. I would rather have the namespace link earlier on than it currently is and have that be dereferenceable. Having the first link to the vocabulary not be to the namespace but to format-specific URLs strikes me as a recipe for problems. Does the vocabulary really count as non-normative? The phasing "also available as" seems odd too. Is it OK if I use the PROV-O approach. That strikes me as preferable. Dave > > Phil > > On 20/11/2013 20:20, Timothy Lebo wrote: >> GLD, >> >> Regarding http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/, would it be possible >> to state within the first screenful of the page a centered statement >> like: >> >> “The RDFS encoding of the Data Cube Vocabulary is available >> <a>here</a>.” >> >> For example, in the abstract of http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/, it >> states two critical elements of Linked Data developers: >> >> The namespace for all PROV-O terms is >> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#. >> The OWL encoding of the PROV Ontology is available here. >> >> Thanks, >> Tim Lebo >> >
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 23:21:44 UTC