- From: Ghislain Atemezing <atemezin@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 20:39:57 +0200
- To: John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Hi John, ------------- Ghislain Atemezing EURECOM, Multimedia Communication Department Campus SophiaTech 450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France email: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4- 9300 8178 Fax: +33 (0)4- 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin Le 16 mai 2013 à 19:05, John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com> a écrit : > Pursuant to my action item, here are my comments on the 5-star Linked > Data definition bullets... > > NOTE: The definitions we use in the Glossary and below are the words > of TBL, added to his Linked Data design note ca 2010 > <http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html> > To be more precise, the definitions we have in the Glossary come from this link: http://5stardata.info, which also provide some examples. > ★ make your stuff available on the Web (whatever format) under an open license > > * I've always felt the word "stuff" is too cute... > * PROPOSE: Publish your data on the Web in any format accompanied by > an explicit "open license" (expression of rights) > +1 > ★★ make it available as structured data (e.g., Excel instead of image > scan of a table) > > * PROPOSE: Publish your data in a common, structured, machine-readable format > +0 because we still need to give examples of structured data… > ★★★ use non-proprietary formats (e.g., CSV instead of Excel) > > * I don't think we need to slam M$FT... > * PROPOSE: Publish your data in a non-proprietary format (e.g. CSV) > +1 as I thing it solves the issue raised by Sandro. > ★★★★ use URIs to denote things, so that people can point at your stuff > <= TBL's version > ★★★★ Published using open standards from the W3C (RDF and SPARQL) <= GLD version > > * PROPOSE: Publish your data using HTTP URIs as (resolveable) names > for things; when someone (or something) looks up a URI, return useful > information based on W3C standards (including RDF, XML, SPARQL) > +1 as it is much more explicit > ★★★★★ link your data to other data to provide context <= TBL's version > ★★★★★ All of the above and links to other Linked Open Data <= GLD version > > * PROPOSE: Include links (URIs) to other Linked (Open) Data in your > published data > -1. PROPOSE: All the above and include links (URIs) to other Linked (Open) Data in your published data. > Iterate on that… Many thanks for the proposals… Ghislain > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: >> I went to review the glossary again, and got stuck on the first item. >> >> There's debate about whether Excel is "proprietary" -- I believe Microsoft >> claims it is not. See: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary_format#Controversial >> >> >> And the fourth star is just wrong -- it could easily be read as allowing >> plain XML or plain HTML, since those are open standards from W3C. >> >> Lets use the words on the mug, with some additional commentary. >> >> - s >> > > > > -- > John S. Erickson, Ph.D. > Director, Web Science Operations > Tetherless World Constellation (RPI) > <http://tw.rpi.edu> <olyerickson@gmail.com> > Twitter & Skype: olyerickson >
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 18:40:27 UTC