- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:21:53 +0000
- To: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: public-gld-wg@w3.org, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
On 19 Mar 2013, at 22:55, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I tend to think of DC Elements as referring to 1.0 and DC Terms to >>> 1.1. Certainly the page you link to is called "dmci-terms". >>> >>> Suggest s/Element Set/Metadata Terms/ in both title and body. >> >> Good catch. How about we just stick with the core 15 terms widely used. >> Are you OK with this? > > I would prefer to refer to "Dublin Core Metadata Terms". There has been a preference for using DCT rather than old DC elements in all the public sector I've been involved in for some years. > > However, I'm not a DCMI person, presumably there's others in the group better placed to advise on correct terminology. I'm not a DCMI person either, but remember seeing a statement from DCMI that discourages use of the old namespace. I agree that we should refer to the new namespace, and agree to Dave's proposed change. Richard
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:22:27 UTC