Re: AW: AW: AW: [QB-UCR] Review comments

Hi Benedikt,

I am satisfied that you have addressed my feedback comments.

While further polishing of the document would be possible I would be 
happy to see this published as a Working Group note.

Sorry to have taken so long to take a look at this.

Dave

On 11/06/13 07:09, Benedikt Kaempgen wrote:
> Dear Dave,
>
> I have now implemented all your feedback [1] as discussed in the last emails.
>
> Thanks for your great help in improving the data cube use cases document.
>
> It would be great if you could let us know whether you are happy with the changes.
>
> Best,
>
> Benedikt
>
> [1] <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube-ucr/index.html>
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: Dave Reynolds [dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2013 15:37
> An: Benedikt Kaempgen
> Cc: Government Linked Data Working Group
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [QB-UCR] Review comments
>
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> On 30/05/13 14:25, Benedikt Kaempgen wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the case study.
>>
>>> I've attached a draft of this for inclusion in your document when you
>>> are ready to do so. Feel to tweak it to fit your structure if
>>> necessary.
>> For the other case studies, I mentioned expected benefits of using the data cube vocabulary. Can you maybe name some for this case study?
>
> OK. I suggest:
>
> * Explicit metadata describing the forecast process, coverage and
> phenomena being forecast; making the data self-describing.
>
> * Linking to other linked data resources (particularly geographic
> regions and named places associated with the forecast locations)
> enabling discovery of related data.
>
> * Ability to define slices through the data for convenient consumption
> by applications.
>
> Dave
>

Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 15:56:50 UTC