- From: Fadi Maali <fadi.maali@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:28:19 +0000
- To: Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Hi all, Based on the discussion related to issue 26: https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/26 The current proposal is to recommend using URIs defined by the Library of Congress in DCAT specification copied from Richard's email before (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2012Oct/0151.html ) [[ PROPOSAL: In DCAT-conformant data, values of dcterms:language MUST be members of some subclass, and SHOULD be ISO-639 URIs as defined by the Library of Congress in http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/iso639-1.html and http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/iso639-2.html . The iso639-1 codes should be preferred, and iso639-2 codes used only when no iso639-1 code is available for a language. This resolves ISSUE-26 ]] please provide any feedback or opinion you might have. Regards, Fadi
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 20:28:52 UTC