W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Minutes for W3C GLD WG telecon 24-Jan-2013

From: Boris Villazón-Terrazas <boris.villazon@terrazas.name>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:44:45 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ9EsGLS6P=uBCugMUto+qAUeFXFck2KRS3W4PaSw62SZt8gWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joăo Paulo Almeida <jpalmeida@inf.ufes.br>
Cc: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>, Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>, "public-gld-wg@w3.org" <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Thanks Joăo Paulo for your comments!
I'm checking telecon minutes [1] and I think there wasn't an official
decision about Stability section.
will we keep and improve that section?

Best

Boris

[1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-02-14


On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Joăo Paulo Almeida
<jpalmeida@inf.ufes.br>wrote:

> Dear Bernadette and others,
>
> I have reviewed the section on Stability of the BP document, and I believe
> it is not ready for prime time.
>
> Honestly, I would recommend dropping this section or replacing it by a
> fairly generic piece of text that only raises stability as a concern (one
> or two paragraphs), and points to useful references (further reading). I'm
> not an expert on the topic, but I am willing to volunteer to produce this,
> if the group agrees this is the way to go.
>
> There is a lot of work on long-term data preservation and the "properties"
> described in the text (section 6.3 are quite confusing and do not seem
> focused). This is not a simple issue, see, e.g. (a lot of initiatives are
> listed including standards on long-term data preservation):
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_preservation
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OAIS
>
> Best regards,
> Joăo Paulo
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Boris Villazón-Terrazas <boris.villazon@terrazas.name>
> Date: Sunday, January 27, 2013 5:50 PM
> To: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
> Cc: Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>, "public-gld-wg@w3.org" <
> public-gld-wg@w3.org>
>
> Subject: Re: Minutes for W3C GLD WG telecon 24-Jan-2013
> Resent-From: <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:50:54 +0000
>
> Thanks Michael, Bernadette
>
> Since Anne and Ron are not available, any volunteer to take care of
> section 13. Stability? Biplav? Joao Paulo?
>
> Best,
>
> Boris
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Bernadette Hyland <
> bhyland@3roundstones.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Boris,
>> Thanks for circulating.  A couple WG members in yesterday's telecon
>> agreed to do a thorough review and comment.  This included Biplav and Joao
>> Paulo.
>>
>> Note: We should update assignments to Anne and Ron who are no longer
>> involved in the WG AFAIK.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bernadette
>>
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:08 AM, Boris Villazón-Terrazas <
>> boris.villazon@terrazas.name> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all
>>
>> Apologies for missing yesterday telecon's ... and for not sending my
>> regrets in advance.
>>
>> Regarding the BP document, I was working with the BP document including
>> some comments from outside, e.g, Olaf, but I think it's time to try to
>> finalize this first version. We can make the rest of improvements later on
>>
>> The current version is here [1].
>>
>> Currently, there are some sections to review, so I would suggest the
>> following section and reviewers:
>> - Background - Bernadette
>> - Linked Open Data Lifecycle -  Boris & Solve the current issue
>> (ISSUE-15)
>> - Vocabulary Selection - Boris/Ghis
>> - URI Construction - John ERickson/Boris
>> - 6. URI Policy for Persistence - Bernadette/John Erickson
>> - 8. Specifying an appropiate License - Bernadette
>> - 9. Security and hosting -  Michael Pendleton
>> - 10. Publishers "Social Contract" -  Bernadette
>> - 11. Pragmatic Provenance -  John Erickson
>> - 12. Versioning -  John Erickson
>> - 13. Stability -  Anne Washington (GMU), Ron Reck
>> - 14. Source Data -  Biplav
>>
>> Reviewers would have one week to review their section, then we'll have
>> another week to fix the document. I'll be the one to be doing the whole
>> edition, and Bernadette can help me identifying possible minor issues. More
>> help is appreciated.
>> In summary after two weeks we should have a preliminary stable version of
>> the document, so we can publish as a FPWD ....
>> Then, we can continue with the weekly updates and improvements.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Boris
>>
>> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> See [1] for today's minutes.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Benedikt
>>>
>>> [1] <http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-01-24>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 17 February 2013 16:45:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 June 2013 15:04:58 UTC