W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: suggested shortnames

From: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:12:58 +0100
Cc: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>, "public-gld-wg@w3.org" <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7747D599-EEDC-4D9C-BF9E-11326DB3E4E0@fi.upm.es>
To: Christophe Guéret <c.d.m.gueret@vu.nl>

On Mar 7, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Christophe Guéret wrote:

> 
> 
> On 7 March 2012 10:01, Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr> wrote:
> 
> >>>> For "org" and "people", I'm inclined to go with vocab-org and
> >>>> vocab-people. I think http://www.w3.org/TR/people suggests a somewhat
> >>>> larger scope than this document has.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> +1 for vocab-people etc. - looks sensible and scalable to me.
> >>
> >> +1
> >
> > +1 too
> +1 also for vocab-people
> +1

+1
>  
> > The mobile WG I was in produced a couple of Best Practice docs that have
> > short names of mobile-bp and mwabp. The former works because it includes
> > the word mobile but the same isn't true for mwabp which I always
> > struggle to remember.
> >
> > Personally I'd leave out the government bit but the group consensus
> > seems to be to keep it, so I end up with suggesting
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/gld-bp
> 
> +1
>  +1
> 
+1


Best

Boris
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 12:13:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:13:26 UTC