- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:32:13 +0000
- To: Benedikt Kämpgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>
- CC: public-gld-wg@w3.org
On 07/03/12 12:33, Benedikt Kämpgen wrote: > Hello, > >> vocab-people >> vocab-org for the Organization Ontology? >> vocab-data-cube for the Data Cube Vocabulary? > > All fine for me. For the Data Cube Vocabulary vocab-qb would probably work as well. +1 [I'm fine with either but since 'qb' is the preferred prefix for Data Cube it does give a natural short shortname.] Dave > > Best, > > Benedikt > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:27 AM >> To: public-gld-wg@w3.org >> Subject: suggested shortnames >> >> One aspect of publication by W3C is the assignment of a permanent URL to >> the document and its future versions. For example: >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/gov-data >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/void >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub >> >> The selection of that last part, the "shortname", is technically up to the W3C >> staff/management, but ideally it's something the WG is happy with, too. >> >> In our last telecon I agreed to suggest names for our documents. >> >> For some of them, the current names on the editor's draft filenames are >> fine, I think: data-cube, data-cube-ucr, dcat, dcat-ucr. >> >> For "org" and "people", I'm inclined to go with vocab-org and >> vocab-people. I think http://www.w3.org/TR/people suggests a somewhat >> larger scope than this document has. >> >> For bp, I don't have any great ideas. ldpb, linked-data-pb, >> ld-best-practices, gld-best-practices, ld-pb, ld-pub, ... these would >> all be acceptable, I think, but none are great. The one aspect of >> this that's not a coin flip, I think, is whether to put the word >> "government" and the letter "g" in the title. I lean slightly against >> it, because I think it would scare away some people who would find the >> document useful, but that's just my relatively uninformed opinion. >> >> If I had to pick right now, I'd go with "publishing-linked-data", which is a >> pretty long "short" name, but it's clear, at least. >> >> So, those are my suggestions; I'm happy to discuss them more. >> >> -- Sandro >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 08:32:49 UTC