- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 08:56:34 +0000
- To: public-gld-wg@w3.org
On 07/03/2012 08:39, Dave Reynolds wrote: > On 07/03/12 06:01, Michael Hausenblas wrote: >> >>> For "org" and "people", I'm inclined to go with vocab-org and >>> vocab-people. I think http://www.w3.org/TR/people suggests a somewhat >>> larger scope than this document has. >> >> >> +1 for vocab-people etc. - looks sensible and scalable to me. > > +1 +1 too > >>> The one aspect of >>> this that's not a coin flip, I think, is whether to put the word >>> "government" and the letter "g" in the title. I lean slightly against >>> it, because I think it would scare away some people who would find the >>> document useful, but that's just my relatively uninformed opinion. >> >> We're chartered for GLD. Our prime 'customers' are government agency. >> Let's be honest and stick with what/who we are. Don't get me wrong - I >> love the idea that the stuff we write is reusable and in a sense >> applicable to other domains, but I think we're sending out the wrong >> message. I fear that in an attempt to maximise potential reuse down the >> line we fail to show respect and dedication towards our main audience: >> governments. > > +1, the best practice document should include "gld" or similar in the > shortname. > > My personal pick would be gld-best-practice but have no very strong > preference. The mobile WG I was in produced a couple of Best Practice docs that have short names of mobile-bp and mwabp. The former works because it includes the word mobile but the same isn't true for mwabp which I always struggle to remember. Personally I'd leave out the government bit but the group consensus seems to be to keep it, so I end up with suggesting http://www.w3.org/TR/gld-bp Phil -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://www.w3.org/egov/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 08:56:55 UTC