Re: Comment response policy?

Thanks Sandro, that all sounds like a very reasonable and sensible approach.

Cheers,
Bernadette
 
On Feb 18, 2012, at 6:19 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:

> On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 14:57 +0000, Dave Reynolds wrote:
>> I have just responded on public-gld-comments@w3.org to some helpful 
>> review comments concerning Data Cube.
>> 
>> Then I belated remembered that in the RIF WG we had a policy that 
>> Working Group members could not individually respond on the comments 
>> list, those had to be approved group level responses.
>> 
>> What's the policy in GLD?
> 
> I don't think we've talked about this.   I suggest we try a fairly loose
> policy, where people can reply if they are confident no one in the WG
> would have a problem with their response.   So, simple factual responses
> pointing to the specs, or telling people that an issue has been raised
> on that top and we'll get back to them, ... stuff like that I think can
> be done without consulting the group (although, of course, keep the
> comments list CC'd so we can all see it.)
> 
> How does that sound?
> 
> Also, for people not familiar with this process: with every comment, we
> should be sure to ask if our reply addresses the commenter's concern,
> the commenter is satisfied, or something like that, (unless we're in the
> middled of a conversation, asking them other questions), so the reply
> chain ends, on the record, with evidence we did our job and addressed
> every comment.
> 
>     -- Sandro
> 
> 
>