W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > February 2012

ISSUE-28: Is a vocabulary 5-star? [Best Practices]

From: Government Linked Data Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:55:24 +0000
Message-Id: <E1Rvsom-0003p3-Ld@tibor.w3.org>
To: public-gld-wg@w3.org

ISSUE-28: Is a vocabulary 5-star? [Best Practices]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/28

Raised by: Michael Hausenblas
On product: Best Practices


See BERNARD VATANT's great post at:

http://blog.hubjects.com/2012/02/is-your-linked-data-vocabulary-5-star_9588.html

Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 15:55:29 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Hausenblas: "Fwd: ISSUE-12 (valuesForDataFormat): What values to use to describe formats of dcat:Distribution? [DCAT]"
Previous message: Michael Hausenblas: "Re: ISSUE-12 (valuesForDataFormat): What values to use to describe formats of dcat:Distribution? [DCAT]"
Next in thread: Ghislain Atemezing: "Re: ISSUE-28: Is a vocabulary 5-star? [Best Practices]"
Reply: Ghislain Atemezing: "Re: ISSUE-28: Is a vocabulary 5-star? [Best Practices]"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:04:36 GMT