RE: changes to docs, for publication, please double check

Hi, 

DCAT looks good to me. Thanks!

- Fadi


-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org]
Sent: Thu 4/5/2012 8:05 AM
To: Sandro Hawke
Cc: public-gld-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: changes to docs, for publication, please double check
 
Unless Fadi or John say otherwise, I'd say DCAT is good to go too.

Phil.

On 05/04/2012 07:01, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> Editors, please look over all the changes I made to your documents in
> order to (1) make our respec use consistent across the documents, and
> (2) fix broken links and broken markup, (3) makes sure there's a proper
> SOTD.   Hopefully I didn't actually break anything.
>
> You can also check the publication-location versions, to make sure those
> are also okay.   They are NOT CONSIDERED PUBLISHED until they actually
> appear on http://www.w3.org/TR and the shortnames become live -- before
> that, these URLs should not be shown in public; after that, the
> documents should not be changed.
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-vocab-dcat-20120405/
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-vocab-org-20120405/
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-vocab-people-20120405/
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-vocab-data-cube-20120405/
>
>      -- Sandro
>
>
>
>

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C eGovernment
http://www.w3.org/egov/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1

Received on Thursday, 5 April 2012 10:46:21 UTC