W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-comments@w3.org > October 2013

Re: DCAT comments - dataset dependecy - http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-vocab-dcat-20130801/

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:05:53 -0400
Message-ID: <526EDFC1.6040003@w3.org>
To: Johan De Smedt <johan.de-smedt@tenforce.com>
CC: Fadi Maali <fadi.maali@deri.org>, vasily.bunakov@stfc.ac.uk, "public-gld-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-gld-comments@w3.org>
Hopefully by now you've seen the below response from Fadi Maali on 
behalf of the GLD WG.  We apologize for the delay in sending it.   Does 
Fadi's explanation make sense and resolve your comment?  Procedurally, 
we need to record whether comments have been addressed, and let 
dissastified commenters know they have the option of raising a Formal 
Objection.

Thanks for your interest in DCAT and your review of the specification.

      -- Sandro    (GLD WG staff contact)


On 10/24/2013 09:32 PM, Fadi Maali wrote:
> Hello Johan,
>
> Following up on the issue you raised before on DCAT.
>
> On 15 Aug 2013, at 22:00, Johan De Smedt <johan.de-smedt@tenforce.com> wrote:
>
>> B) For the schema description (i.e. [2] - the formal specification of syntax or semantics going with a data set), I did not find an alternative yet that is better than void:vocabulary.
>> Such a property is useful (like but complementary to dcat:mediaType or dct:format) to know if an application can actual process the information referenced by the DCAT.
>> Example use case:
>> -1- The EU publication has itís own owl schema.  applications not knowing this schema will have difficulty to process the data.
>>    Having the schema:
>>    i) published
>>    ii) referenced in the dcat:Distribution of a data set published complying to that schema
>>    would allow for an application to select the correct data set manifestation to be able to process or render the information.
>> -2- Eurostat statiscal information may be published using XML, RDF/XML, csv, html
>>    Especially when XML or RDF/XML is used it seems relevant to know which XML or OWL schema is used to know if the data can be processed.
> I absolutely agree that having a description of the schema is very useful in many scenarios. However, this problem was considered out the scope of DCAT because of design choice  to have a minimal focused vocabulary and due to the available time/resources. Notice that DCAT makes no assumption about the dataset format or content. As you mentioned in your email, there exists a number of properties that can be used for particular datasets as void:vocabulary and I think there is some efforts in schema.org and elsewhere to describe schema of CSV datasets. However as I mentioned above, given the scope (and the resources) of DCAT, the schema description is not addressed.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Fadi Maali
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 22:06:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 10 October 2018 10:43:23 UTC