- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 14:23:23 +0000
- To: Florian Stegmaier <stegmaier@dimis.fmi.uni-passau.de>
- CC: public-gld-comments@w3.org, code <code@know-center.at>
Hi Florian, Many thanks for the report. For the three ICs which you show as failing do you consider these: (a) an error in the definition of the IC in the Data Cube specification, (b) the nature of your data in its current state (we understand this is ongoing research), or (c) some other problem such as limitations of the testing environment for your particular data? The critical thing for the W3C process is (a). For IC-1 and IC-4 I assume this is b/c but I'm unclear on why IC-3 fails for you and whether you regard this as an issue with the spec. [The sparql endpoint is accessible to me, at least at the moment, so I can't investigate directly.] Cheers, Dave On 02/12/13 13:48, Florian Stegmaier wrote: > Hi Dave, > > please find attached our RDF Data Cube Vocabulary implementation report of the FP7 CODE project [1]. It inherits details of the integrity constraints as well as a pointer to the dump where the cubes are hosted. If you need further information, please feel free to contact me. > > Side note: Currently, we are finalizing our prototypes covering lifting of statistical data into data cubes, data cube merging techniques as well as visual analytics components. I can share the links to the web prototypes if anybody is interested in! > > Cheers, > Florian > > [1] http://code-research.eu/ > > > > > _____________________________ > Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier > Chair of Distributed Information Systems > University of Passau > Innstr. 43 > 94032 Passau > > Room 248 ITZ > > Tel.: +49 851 509 3063 > Fax: +49 851 509 3062 > > http://twitter.com/fstegmai > http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/florian-stegmaier/ > _____________________________ >
Received on Monday, 2 December 2013 14:23:57 UTC