Re: Mirroring discussion in Github Repo's on public-geo from Martin Thomson on 2016-02-11 (public-geolocation@w3.org from February 2016)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 21:53:57 +1100
To: Marijn Kruisselbrink <mek@google.com>
Cc: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>, "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, "public-geolocation@w3.org" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVyVD4upQaDEK7cNWQAMTkbX9YLKrANwj1xgUz5HwTNRg@mail.gmail.com>

On 11 February 2016 at 11:38, Marijn Kruisselbrink <mek@google.com> wrote:
> Although on the other hand the device APIs working group is at least
> considering disabling some of this, since it has resulted in fragmented
> discussions where sometimes people only reply to the list rather than to the
> github issues.

Personally, if something is important, I will watch it and find
shifting between two venues for discussion quite difficult.  I'm not
watching several repos of which geofencing is one on the assumption
that important/significant/entertaining discussion was happening on
lists.

Received on Thursday, 11 February 2016 10:54:24 UTC