RE: Proposal to add unit quaternion representation to the Device Orientation event. from Mandyam, Giridhar on 2014-07-24 (public-geolocation@w3.org from July 2014)

From: Mandyam, Giridhar <mandyam@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 12:43:47 +0000
To: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, Tim Volodine <timvolodine@google.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
CC: Rich Tibbett <richt@opera.com>, Rob Manson <roBman@buildar.com>
Message-ID: <CAC8DBE4E9704C41BCB290C2F3CC921A23E2900F@NASANEXD02E.na.qualcomm.com>

If there are no objections to this proposal provided to the mailing list by 5 PM US Pacific Time, August 1, 2014, then I will request the editors (Tim and Rich) to include this proposal in the DeviceOrientation spec.

Thanks,

-Giri

-----Original Message-----
From: Mounir Lamouri [mailto:mounir@lamouri.fr] 
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 3:05 AM
To: Tim Volodine; public-geolocation
Cc: Rich Tibbett; Rob Manson; Mandyam, Giridhar
Subject: Re: Proposal to add unit quaternion representation to the Device Orientation event.

On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, at 00:29, Tim Volodine wrote:
> Proposed interface changes:
> 
> [Callback, NoInterfaceObject]
> interface OrientationQuaternion {
>   readonly attribute double x;
>   readonly attribute double y;
>   readonly attribute double z;
>   readonly attribute double w;
> }

That sounds great! Should we consider adding DOMQuaternion to http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/geometry/ instead of creating it inside this spec?

-- Mounir

Received on Thursday, 24 July 2014 12:44:16 UTC