- From: Wojciech Masłowski <wmaslowski@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:27:23 +0200
- To: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- CC: public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
W dniu 2011-06-30 17:05, Andrei Popescu pisze:
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted to let you know I have updated the "Geolocation API Level
> 2" spec to match the V1 document:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/geo/api/spec-source-v2.html.diff?r1=1.19;r2=1.20;f=h
>
> The diff to V1 is now the Address interface, the optional 'address'
> property on the Position interface and the 'Coordinates.verticalSpeed'
> property just added by Steve.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrei
Some editorial remarks:
> Future versions of the API may allow additional attributes that
> provide other information about this position (e.g. street addresses).
Either remove this or change "street addresses" to something else as
street address is a part of this and not future API.
> interface Address {
> readonly attribute DOMString country;
> readonly attribute DOMString region;
> readonly attribute DOMString county;
> readonly attribute DOMString city;
> readonly attribute DOMString street;
> readonly attribute DOMString streetNumber;
> readonly attribute DOMString premises;
> readonly attribute DOMString additionalInformation;
> readonly attribute DOMString postalCode;
> };
> All of the Address attributes are optional. If an implementation
> cannot provide a particular attribute, its value must be null.
If they are optional then shouldn't we add '?' to IDL?
--
Wojciech Masłowski
Engeneering CORE Wrocław
Opera Software ASA
http://www.opera.com
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 15:28:21 UTC