sounds great. On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Steve Block <steveblock@google.com> wrote: > Hi Doug, > > Sure. I think that delaying the event to make sure that the data is > fresh complies with what's currently written, but it makes sense to > state this explicitly. Perhaps we could go further and say something > like 'When a new listener registers for the event, implementations > should fire the event as soon as sufficiently fresh data is > available'. > > Steve > > -- > Google UK Limited > Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 9TQ > Registered in England Number: 3977902 >Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 23:13:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 22 March 2012 18:13:56 GMT