- From: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:27:10 +0000
- To: Doug Turner <dougt@dougt.org>
- CC: "public-geolocation@w3.org" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Friday, November 12, 2010 10:21 PM, Doug Turner wrote: > Hey Adrian! > > Yeah, probably misleading. Basically, I think, we want to use the origin. > > f.e. http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/geolocation/ ==> > http://www.mozilla.com > > I think there was some panic about referencing documents that were not > recommendations, but we were thinking about: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/origin-0.html#origin > > Does this make sense? > Doug Hi Doug, I understand the serialisation - I think the issue with the TAG is that the canonicalised origin isn't actually a URI so they wanted the language changed to clarify this. My problem is that there is a MUST requirement that UAs display this string but as far as I can see, nobody actually does (the implementations I've seen don't show the "http://" part). My question, therefore, is does it make sense that this is a MUST? Since we need to go back and change the language around URI anyway perhaps we could consider making these only SHOULDs. Thanks, Adrian.
Received on Monday, 15 November 2010 15:27:48 UTC