Re: Geolocation privacy implementation

I thought that specific UI implementations was out of scope in this WG.

Doug

On Jul 7, 2010, at 11:54 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:

> A colleague at Opera suggested that perhaps we could look at the "Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines" for inspiration on what a BCP document for Geolocation UI guidelines could look like. There is certainly a degree of overlap between [1] and what we have been discussing. See, for example, the section on indicators.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-wsc-ui-20100622/
> 
> On 7/6/10 1:58 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 7/6/10 1:27 PM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
>>> Thanks for that contribution. As far as iOS, I haven't tested version
>>> 4, but as of version 3, there was a similar allow/deny, but it
>>> automatically remembered, with no way to revoke.
>>> 
>> 
>> FYI, I wrote a blog post a few weeks ago about "Privacy issues in Mobile
>> Safari on iPhone OS 3.2".
>> 
>> http://datadriven.com.au/2010/06/privacy-issues-in-mobile-safari-on-iphone-os-3-0/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 6, 2010, at 4:49 AM, Angel Machín wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Richard,
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Richard L. Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> It seems like it could be helpful to users if this group could
>>>>> discuss some
>>>>> of these areas where there are differences, and maybe produce a BCP
>>>>> for how
>>>>> they should be resolved (probably in the form of some privacy UI
>>>>> recommendations in the API spec).
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I have tested the web app in Android, I am attaching a screen snapshot.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Angel
>>>> <_android_geo.png>
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Marcos Caceres
> Opera Software
> 

Received on Thursday, 8 July 2010 17:23:25 UTC