Re: Additional security and privacy considerations?

On Wed, 27 May 2009 16:26:57 +0200, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote:
> On 27 May 2009, at 16:15, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> For clarity, I would propose avoiding RFC2119 keywords in this
>> section. We could instead say:
>
> I'm not particularly happy with that step, in particular since the  
> section is already clearly labelled as non-normative, and since the  
> phrase in question puts a burden on implementors -- instead of listing a  
> requirement that implementations should conform to.

Please, no RFC 2119 terminology in non-normative prose. That is very confusing.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/