On Tue, 26 May 2009 19:52:22 +0200, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote: > These extensions can be discussed as: > > 1. Normative language with a MUST (which I'm seeing opposition against) > 2. Normative language with a SHOULD (which I saw Hixie and Lars Erik > suggest earlier) > 3. Non-normative guidance (which I'd be willing to accept, as I said > earlier; in that case, I'd like to re-add the examples and elaborate a > bit more on the text) > > My question is whether there is opposition against 2 or 3. You could also have normative language with a "MAY". To make it clear it is allowed, but not required if it is not desirable. Since it is a UI matter that seems perfectly reasonable. (To me, anyway.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 17:56:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:54:11 GMT