okay, after sleeping on this, I disagree with myself. :-) If the "timeout" attribute starting point is measured from when watchPosition or getCurrentPosition is invoked, then what we are talking about is basically what window.setTimeout can currently do in conjunction with this spec. timeout would effectively be a connivence for developers. It reduces the amount of code a developer would have to write, and I am all for that. however, i still think the implementations should take the timeout starting point to mean "after the user has granted permission" for many reasons, one being this can not be emulated by window.setTimeout. Doug On Mar 17, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Doug Turner wrote: > is there a use case we have that can't be implemented with > window.setTimeout()? If not, i propose to remove it. > > Doug > > > On Mar 17, 2009, at 4:18 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: > >> What exactly doesn't make sense? Anyway, should we just remove >> timeout >> altogether? I'd be ok with that. >Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 15:36:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:13:31 GMT