- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:55:10 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org>
- Cc: public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Alissa Cooper wrote: > > A question on process: the spec currently says things like, > "Implementors who are not taking part in the discussions are likely to > find the specification changing out from under them in incompatible > ways" and "This is just an informal proposal at this time." Do those > stay in for last call? The latter statement in particular is bordering > on fallacious considering that all the UAs in the group have already > implemented the spec. The pubrules: http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules?year=2009&uimode=filter&filter=Filter+pubrules&filterValues=form&docstatus=lc-wd-tr&patpol=w3c&rectrack=yes&normative=yes&prevrec=none#docreqs ...say: "It must set expectations about the (in)stability of the document. The recommended text is: Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress." HTH, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 19:55:49 UTC