Just to clarify, I wasn't expressing opposition to those changes, just noting that there should probably be rough consensus on whatever ends up in the final document. --Richard Andrei Popescu wrote: > Hi, > > On topic of moving issues 6 and 7 (renaming 'enableHighAccuracy' & > moving the 'speed' and 'heading' attributes) to v2 and keeping v1 in > sync with reality (i.e. shipped implementations), I have seen > opposition from Allen and Richard. Everyone else who replied seemed to > be ok with keeping the spec as is. I have therefore moved those two > issues to V2 and added a note about the reasoning. I think we can now > move to Last Call? > > http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/6 > http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/7 > > Many thanks, > Andrei > >Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 13:07:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:13:32 GMT