Re: WebIDL, optional attributes

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Marcin
Hanclik<Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Thanks for the changes.
>
>>>I don't think this is a problem: I haven't seen any implementers
>>>complaining about this. 'double' is pretty clear and maps well to JS's
>>>Number type.
> Yeah, the question is what got implemented ...
> Spec(s) should be fixed first in order to have good implementations.
>

In this case I bet they all did the right thing :)

Thanks,
Andrei