Hi Anne, On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Anne van Kesteren<annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:13:15 +0200, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote: >> Sure, I think hasFeature() would work. Let's see what the rest of the >> groups says. > > Versioning on of APIs for the Web does not work. However, if you really feel you have to do something here the least harm is done by introducing a new string for hasFeature(), indeed. (And it would also consistent with other DOM APIs.) > > I don't think it's an issue right now. We can see in V2, depending on which way the API will evolve. Thanks, AndreiReceived on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 12:33:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:13:32 GMT