Re: updated editor's draft of the Geolocation API specification

On Jun 4, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Max Froumentin wrote:

> Hi Andrei,
>
> On 4. juni. 2009, at 12.49, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> I've just updated the editor drafts of the Geolocation API spec:
>
> I notice that RFC2119 is not in the bibliography, even though  
> there's a link to it in the spec.
>
>> I'd like to take the opportunity to remind you to consider the
>> question in the following email:
>>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2009Jun/0000.html
>>
>> and express your opinion. I would like to close this issue asap and
>> move the spec to the next stage. We are already behind schedule.
>
> For what it's worth, I am in also favour of not including the  
> additional sentence. For the reasons you mention, but also because  
> prose of the form "this specification doesn't mandate a way to...  
> however one way might be...", although not strictly contradictory,  
> very often leads to confusion. Secondly, the particular time-scoping  
> solution mentioned suggests awkward user interaction, and might  
> influence implementers the wrong way.

+1  drop this from the spec.

Doug