W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > April 2009

Re: geolocation privacy statement strawman

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:32:15 +0200
To: public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uru0z1rt64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:19:19 +0200, Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org> wrote:
> FWIW, I agree with Angel that the "shoulds" above should be "musts." If  
> the whole section is going to be non-normative anyway, what's the harm?

If the text is going to be non-normative it should not use RFC 2119  
terminology at all because that just creates confusion.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Saturday, 4 April 2009 11:33:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 22 March 2012 18:13:43 GMT