W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > April 2009

RE: editor's draft should link to last published draft

From: Allan Thomson (althomso) <althomso@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:41:44 -0700
Message-ID: <18B307BFDE5098438B0BF42A4E508FB5081DACBE@xmb-sjc-228.amer.cisco.com>
To: "Lars Erik Bolstad" <lbolstad@opera.com>, "Doug Turner" <doug.turner@gmail.com>
Cc: "Max Froumentin" <maxfro@opera.com>, <public-geolocation@w3.org>
The list of open issues does not include all of the comments raised in
my review of the document.

Should I add all of my issues to this web page now as well?

Allan

-----Original Message-----
From: public-geolocation-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-geolocation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lars Erik
Bolstad
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 5:21 AM
To: Doug Turner
Cc: Max Froumentin; public-geolocation@w3.org
Subject: Re: editor's draft should link to last published draft

It is overdue.

In order for us to proceed to last call we need to close all open 
issues, of which there are currently three:
http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/open

ISSUE-2: Should the Geolocation API include privacy information?
This should be closed. We have concluded that the API will not include 
privacy information. We should focus on ISSUE-5 instead.

ISSUE-3: Exposing civic addresses in the API
This is for "version 2" of the spec and should not hold up our 
transition to last call for "version 1".

ISSUE-5: What should the Recommendation state about security and privacy

considerations?
Andrei, could you maybe put your latest draft wording into the editor's 
draft. I think it looks good.

Lars Erik

Doug Turner wrote:
> on a related note, what is the time frame for the next draft?
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com 
> <mailto:maxfro@opera.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     When you google "w3c geolocation" you get the editor's draft, and
>     not the published draft. And because the editor's draft doesn't
>     link to the published one, it can be confusing to find out what
>     the official W3C status is. Can it be changed so that one links to
>     the other?
>
>     Cheers,
>     Max.
>
>
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 14:42:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 22 March 2012 18:13:43 GMT