On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com> wrote: >>> It is overdue. >>> >>> In order for us to proceed to last call we need to close all open issues, of >>> which there are currently three: >>> http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/open >>> >>> ISSUE-2: Should the Geolocation API include privacy information? >>> This should be closed. We have concluded that the API will not include >>> privacy information. We should focus on ISSUE-5 instead. >>> >> >> Agreed. >> >>> ISSUE-3: Exposing civic addresses in the API >>> This is for "version 2" of the spec and should not hold up our transition to >>> last call for "version 1". >>> >> >> Agreed. >> >>> ISSUE-5: What should the Recommendation state about security and privacy >>> considerations? >>> Andrei, could you maybe put your latest draft wording into the editor's >>> draft. I think it looks good. >>> >> >> Ok, will ping the list once I'm done. >> > > Done. I have also did s/did/made :) AndreiReceived on Friday, 3 April 2009 13:46:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:54:10 GMT