W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > April 2009

Re: editor's draft should link to last published draft

From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:43:26 +0100
Message-ID: <708552fb0904030643l662a7521l4114b6327f369b4@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com>
Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>, public-geolocation@w3.org
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com> wrote:
>> It is overdue.
>>
>> In order for us to proceed to last call we need to close all open issues, of
>> which there are currently three:
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/open
>>
>> ISSUE-2: Should the Geolocation API include privacy information?
>> This should be closed. We have concluded that the API will not include
>> privacy information. We should focus on ISSUE-5 instead.
>>
>
> Agreed.
>
>> ISSUE-3: Exposing civic addresses in the API
>> This is for "version 2" of the spec and should not hold up our transition to
>> last call for "version 1".
>>
>
> Agreed.
>
>> ISSUE-5: What should the Recommendation state about security and privacy
>> considerations?
>> Andrei, could you maybe put your latest draft wording into the editor's
>> draft. I think it looks good.
>>
>
> Ok, will ping the list once I'm done.
>

Done. I have also did some small clarifications to the existing
wording based on comments from Allan Thomson (in the "api comments"
thread). The diff is here:

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/geo/api/spec-source.html.diff?r1=1.49&r2=1.50&f=h

Thanks,
Andrei
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 13:44:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 22 March 2012 18:13:43 GMT